PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG TERHADAP AKTIVITAS BELAJAR DAN HASIL BELAJAR MATA PELAJARAN TIK PADA SISWA KELAS X SMA KOTA MATARAM

PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG TERHADAP AKTIVITAS BELAJAR DAN HASIL BELAJAR MATA PELAJARAN TIK PADA SISWA KELAS X SMA KOTA MATARAM

Authors

  • Lalu Iwan Eko Jakandar Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah (STIT) Islamiyah NTB

Keywords:

Model Pembelajaran Langsung, Aktivitas Belajar, Hasil Belajar

Abstract

This research aims to know (1) the influence of direct learning model to learning activity of the Tenth Grade Students of Senior High School in TIK subject at Mataram, and (2) the influence of direct learning model tolearning achievement of Senior High School Students in TIK at Mataram. This research is a qualitative research which is applying quasy experiment method. There are two variables of this research namely direct learning as independent variable and learning activity as dependent variable. The technique applied to collect the data of this research are observation rubric and the learning achievement test. The subjects of this research are 97 students from the tenth grade students of Senior High School at Mataram who are registered in 2015/2016 academic year. They are divided into 3 groups; grade XI1students of SMA DahrulHikmahMataram as the controlled group, grade XI2 students of   SMA DahrulHikmahMataram as the first experimental group and XI2 SMA TrisaktiMataram as the second experimental group. The instrument have been examined by doing normality test using Kolmogorov Smirnov, meanwhile homogeneity and hypothesis test had been done through the analisis of varians (ANOVA) formula using SPSS 16.0. program. The research finding shows that the average score achieved by controlled group in pretest is 68,64, while the average score achieved in posttest is 78,33. Moreover, the average soccer achieved by the first experiment group in pretest is 71,09 and the average posttest score is 83,13, while average score achieved by the second experiment group in pretest is 72,50 and post-test average score is 83,91. Based on data analysis finding, it might be concluded that there is a different learning achievement between learning using direct learning model and without direct learning model. In the other words, after giving treatment using direct learning model, the students learning achievement is increasing compared to their learning achievement without direct learning model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arends, R. (2007). Learning to Teach. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Book Company.
Buku Pedoman Penulisan Tesis. (2015). Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Surabaya.
Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2006). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Hadi, S. (2001). Metodelogi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Yasbit Fakultas Psikologi UGM
Hamzah B. Uno. (2008). Model Pembelajaran Menciptakan Proses Belajar Mengajar yang Kreatif dan Efektif. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.
Joko Winarto. (2013). Teori Belajar Sosial Albert Bandura http://www.kompasiana.com/jokowinarto/teori-belajar-sosial-albert-bandura_133119 a17fa Diakses 12 Oktober 2015
Joyce, B. Weil, M., and Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of Teaching, Eighth Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kasdi, S dan Nur, M. (2005). Pengajaran Langsung. Surabaya: University Press.
Poerwanto. (2010). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Jakarta. Pustaka Belajar
Ratumanan, T.G. (2004). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Surabaya. UNESA University Press.
Rosdiani, D. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Langsung dalam Pendidikan Jasmani dan Kesehatan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rosalia, T. (2005). Aktifitas Belajar. http://id.shvoong.com/ social-sciences-/1961162-aktifitas-belajar/ diakses tanggal 27 November 2015
Sagala, S. (2009). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Slavin, R. E. (2003). Educational Psychology, Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Slameto, (2010). Belajar Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT. Asdi Mahastya.
Sofiyah,. (2010). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Intruction) terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Artikel ini diakses pada tanggal 20 Juli 2015.Dari http://edukasi.kompasiana.com/2015/07/15/model-model-pembelajaran-langsung-directintruction-647828.html.
Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Bandung. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Suharsimi, Arikunto. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka cipta : Jakarta.
Supinah, (2012). Bagaimana Mengukur Aktivitas Siswa dalam Pembelajaran?http://p4tkmatematika .org/2012/05/ bagaimana-mengukur-aktivitas-siswa-dalam-pembelajaran/, Diakses 12 Oktober 2015.
Suyono dan Hariyanto. (2015). Implementasi Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Published

2019-12-13

How to Cite

Jakandar, L. I. E. (2019). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG TERHADAP AKTIVITAS BELAJAR DAN HASIL BELAJAR MATA PELAJARAN TIK PADA SISWA KELAS X SMA KOTA MATARAM. Al-Islamiyah, Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Wawasan Studi Islam, 1(2), 13–25. Retrieved from https://e-journal.stitintb.ac.id/index.php/alislamiyah/article/view/18
Loading...